CSTE 5319 Group Software Critique Guidelines

Group Critique Assigned Web Sites:

Team Tech Minds

            http://www.coolmath.com/algebra/index.html

Team Educational 2.0

            http://www.adaptedmind.com/Sixth-Grade-Math-Worksheets-And-Exercises.html

Team TechGrads

            http://www.naturalmath.com/multmodels/2.html

Instructions:

Each team is assigned to a different web site (online free resources). Browse each link within the assigned site to evaluate the application. Write a team report with APA format and submit the report through Blogger.com. No more than 5 pages with double space for this critique assignment. You must include the needed references to support your team statements. The reference list can be the 6^th page of this report. Your team must provide a proficient input to answer the following questions.

1.      Could this application be applied to any Instructional-Design models? Explain your findings.

2.      How do you value the design of the learning object? See the following guidelines:

·         How is the font appropriate for the audience?

·         How are the text and background colors complimentary to maximize readability?

·         How do the graphics facilitate comprehension of the content topic or learning process?

·         How do the graphics place appropriately on the page in a non-distracting format?

·         Is the learning object visually appealing?

·         Is there an appropriate amount of text on each page?

3.      How do you value the usability of the learning object? See the following guidelines:

·         Are clear and concise directions posted on the learning object?

·         Is the readability of the directions appropriate for the audience?

·         Do all links work?

·         Are the functions of the learning object intuitive? (Do the learners know what to do?)

·         Does the learning object provide for active engagement with the concepts or skills?

4.      How do you evaluate the credibility for this application? See the following guidelines:

·         Is the content information accurate?

·         Is the level of content information appropriate for the intended audience? (not too easy; not too challenging)

·         Is the text written using a professional format?

·         Is the text free of grammatical and spelling errors?

·         Has credit been given to creators?

·         Are appropriate academic references provided?

5.      How is the learning process incorporated in the learning object?

·         Are there clear learning objectives?

·         Does the learning object reinforce concepts progressively?

·         Does the learning object provide an opportunity to receive feedback on the intended knowledge or skill?

·         Does the learning object meet the stated learning objective(s)?